top of page




  1. To prove statistically that it is possible to retrieve 1 bit of information from the future.

  2. To prove that by applying our proprietary Time-Machine process and risking capital on the predictions, it is possible to earn a profit after costs.

  3. To enable as many people as possible around the world to experience the transformative power of their conscious mind.



The Principal of Time-Machine video

How does time-machine predict the future? This 2 minute video is a general overview of the "associative remote viewing" process that allows us to "see" a little bit into the future.



1. Who is the developer of Time-Machine?

My name is Greg Kolodziejzyk, and I am the developer of Time-Machine. Time-Machine combines artificial intelligence with my own time tested method to make intuitive predictions about future events. Read more about my research here.


2. How does Time-Machine predict the future?


Imagine you're trying to guess the outcome of a coin flip tomorrow: heads or tails. 


Instead of guessing the flip directly, you use pictures to help you make your prediction.


  • If the coin is going to land on heads, there will be a picture of a juicy hamburger shown to you.


  • If it's going to land on tails, there will be a picture of a cold ice cream cone shown to you.


Now, your challenge is to “see” or predict which picture will be shown to you tomorrow. And of course, the picture that is shown to you is based on the coin's outcome. If you believe you “see” the hamburger in your mind, you'll predict the coin will be heads. If you "see" the ice cream, you'll predict tails.


This idea of making intuitive predictions by “viewing” or focusing on associated objects or images, rather than the actual event or target itself is called “Associative Remote Viewing”. Scientific experiments have shown that there is a statistically significant effect, but it is VERY VERY small. The Time-Machine app uses repetition to form a consensus, along with some proprietary artificial intelligence technology that significantly increases confidence in your predictions.


3. What kinds of predictions does Time-Machine make?


My company is sort of like a hedge fund, and one of many steps in our investment decision making process is the consideration of intuitive predictions. The Time-Machine web app was developed to allow us to crowdsource these intuitive predictions about various investment opportunities.


4. How do you "remote view"? (How do you ‘see’ something you haven’t seen yet?)


The process of “remote viewing” is personal, and can vary from person to person. Generally, I find it most useful to close my eyes and relax, reaching a meditative state. Then I imagine that I am looking at an image on my computer screen in the future after the predicted event has transpired. Since it is impossible to know anything about the image you will be shown, as they are chosen from a library of over 20,000 random images, your brain can’t become involved in the process, and you have to listen to your subconscious mind. I try to clear my mind so that I’m not thinking of anything at all, and imaging looking around an image on my screen, waiting for some random thought to enter my mind. 


Most often these random thoughts are generated by your thinking brain, and you must ‘edit’ these out (ignore them), as they are typically thoughts about the last image you saw, your lunch, or anything else that might seem ‘suspicious’ to you. The valuable impressions always come as a big surprise where you wonder how you ever could have generated that thought which seemingly came from nowhere, or ‘out of the blue’. Often, these valid impressions about the photo are very weak thoughts that seem to be occurring in the ‘background’ of your mind, and you might come to the realization that, for example, you had been thinking about a clown's face all the while, while trying hard to think about nothing. Pay attention to these weak random background thoughts, as they are often related to your target.


Please keep in mind that the amount of concentrated, focused effort you invest into a good quality remote viewing session is directly correlated to a successful trial. Taking your time to get into a meditative state is highly recommended. Sometimes I listen to Hemi-Sync sound to help me relax and clear my mind. Search for “Hemi-Sync” on Spotify.

5. Do you financially compensate project participants?

YES! If you have been rewarded with a work contract from, and have not previously participated in the project, then we will pay you for your first 5 predictions. 


Here is what the job entails:

At some point, once per day whenever you choose, you must spend at least 30 minutes in a mildly meditative state working your way through 10 trials performing some visualization tasks using the Time-Machine web app. 10 trials equals 1 prediction. Complete 1 prediction (10 trials) each day for 5 days, for a total of up to 5 predictions during a one week period.

At the end of the week, this is what we will pay you based on your prediction success:

1 correct prediction out of 5 predictions = $5
2 correct predictions out of 5 predictions  = $5
3 correct predictions out of 5 predictions = $10
4 correct predictions out of 5 predictions = $25
5 correct predictions out of 5 predictions = $50

After you have successfully completed your 5 prediction contract, you are free to continue to contribute new predictions to the project using the Time-Machine web app as an unpaid research volunteer as often as you like. In exchange for your continued contribution, we will include you in our research update program to keep you informed as to our progress and any new research findings. 

6. Is there scientific evidence that remote viewing is real?


Aside from my own research, YES! According to a META study conducted by Dr. Dean Radin, a summary of all remote viewing experiments conducted by universities and research organizations, showed an astounding overall effect size (objective method of evaluating experiment results as compared to what could be expected by chance) that resulted in odds against chance of ten million to one. Some individual studies actually resulted in odds against chance of over 100 billion to one. The META study summarized the results of over 5.5 million individual trials that spanned the last century.


According to Professor Jessica Utts, a statistician from the University of California, in a report assessing the statistical evidence for psychic functioning requested by Congress and the CIA, “It is clear to this author that anomalous cognition is possible and has been demonstrated. This conclusion is not based on belief, but rather on commonly accepted scientific criteria. The phenomenon has been replicated in a number of forms across laboratories and cultures.” And regarding continuing research, she adds “I believe that it would be wasteful of valuable resources to continue to look for proof. No one who has examined all of the data across laboratories, taken as a collective whole, has been able to suggest methodological or statistical problems to explain the ever-increasing and consistent results to date.”


I’ve been involved as a researcher in this field for over 30 years, and I know many of the top researchers personally as well as many of the U.S. military remote viewers (various U.S. intelligence agencies explored using remote viewing for intelligence gathering in a 20-year, $20 million basic research program). These are upstanding, highly educated individuals who are motivated to further our collective understanding of this mysterious, yet fascinating field. Read this link for a review of all remote viewing research including the US government programs.


Unfortunately, despite all of the scientific evidence, skeptics still refer to remote viewing as a pseudoscience. Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where widely held beliefs were later overturned by more evidence or new discoveries. Instances such as widespread belief that the world was flat remind us that scientific understanding is ever-evolving. What we accept as truth today might be refined or even overturned as new evidence comes to light.

7. Is there scientific evidence that project is predicting the future?

As of May, 2024, after 40,000 trials conducted by 460 participants from 13 countries, we now have an answer: unequivocally YES!

To date, we have collectively completed 40,000 trials which have been 51% correct in predicting their respective future outcomes (where 50% would be expected by chance) resulting in a statistically significant 2.523 standard deviations from chance expectation. This translates to odds against chance of approximately 1 in 160. This means that such an outcome is highly unlikely to occur by random chance, indicating that the predictions are not simply random.

51% might not seem like much, but we can leverage this small effect size with consensus, confidence filtering, and even some external environmental factors to amplify the signal and achieve win rates closer to 60%.

So far, the answer is YES is it possible to travel into the future and bring back a bit of information.

Screen Shot 2024-05-03 at 11.26.43 AM.png
Cumulative z score 2.52 (51%). "0" is 50% chance. A z score > 1.7 is considered statistically significant.
Screen Shot 2024-05-03 at 11.40.00 AM.png
Cumulative z score 4.9 (57%) when using consensus, confidence score and environmental filtering.
bottom of page